Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The removal of well-fixed bone cement from the femoral canal during revision of a total hip replacement (THR) can be difficult and risks the loss of excessive bone stock and perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft. Retaining the cement mantle is attractive, yet the technique of cement-in-cement revision is not widely practised. We have used this procedure at our hospital since 1989. The stems were removed to gain a better exposure for acetabular revision, to alter version or leg length, or for component incompatibility. We studied 136 hips in 134 patients and followed them up for a mean of eight years (5 to 15). A further revision was required in 35 hips (25.7%), for acetabular loosening in 26 (19.1%), sepsis in four, instability in three, femoral fracture in one and stem fracture in one. No femoral stem needed to be re-revised for aseptic loosening. A cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem is a reliable technique in the medium term. It also reduces the risk of perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft.
منابع مشابه
Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures around an unstable cemented femoral stem traditionally requires removal of existing cement. We propose a new technique whereby a well-fixed cement mantle can be retained in cases with simple fractures that can be reduced anatomically when a cemented revision is planned. This technique is well established in femoral ste...
متن کاملHow Much Bone Cement Is Utilized for Component Fixation in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Background: No scientific evidence exists regarding the amount of bone cement used and discarded in primarycemented Total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the exact amount of bone cement utilizedfor component fixation in primary TKA.Methods: In a prospective study carried out at five centers, 133 primary cemented TKAs were performed. One packof 40g Palacos bone cem...
متن کاملFemoral stem impaction grafting: extending the role of cement.
Femoral revision after cemented total hip replacement (THR) might include technical difficulties, following essential cement removal, which might lead to further loss of bone and consequently inadequate fixation of the subsequent revision stem. Femoral impaction allografting has been widely used in revision surgery for the acetabulum, and subsequently for the femur. In combination with a primar...
متن کاملCemented Charnley revision arthroplasty for severe femoral osteolysis.
We reviewed prospectively cemented stem revision in 106 patients with severe femoral endosteal bone lysis without infection. Bone grafts were not used in any of the patients. The minimum follow-up was three years (mean 6 years 4 months). At the last review 76.4% of the patients were free of pain and 17.9% had only mild or occasional discomfort; radiographs showed well-fixed stable stems in 101 ...
متن کاملGeneration of Fretting Wear Debris at the Stem– Cement Interface in Total Hip Replacment
Fretting wear debris generated at the stem–cement interface has nowadays been considered to play an important role in the overall failure of cemented total hip replacement (THR). Those wear debris within a certain size range would transport along bone cement deficiencies to bone tissue, resulting in a significant bone resorption and subsequent aseptic loosening of the femoral component, which i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume
دوره 91 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009